Comments on: Beware of negative caching http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/ The Web's premier link spam killer. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:43:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Frederick Townes http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/#comment-1646 Frederick Townes Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:08:44 +0000 http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/?p=313#comment-1646 W3TC now supports Bad Behavior in v0.8.5.2 W3TC now supports Bad Behavior in v0.8.5.2

]]> By: Bad Behavior / Bad Behaviour: Bad Behavior 2.0.34 http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/#comment-1645 Bad Behavior / Bad Behaviour: Bad Behavior 2.0.34 Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:41:47 +0000 http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/?p=313#comment-1645 [...] FAQ « Beware of negative caching [...] [...] FAQ « Beware of negative caching [...]

]]> By: Michael Hampton http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/#comment-1644 Michael Hampton Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:08:24 +0000 http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/?p=313#comment-1644 I hadn't looked at 1 Blog Cacher since it hadn't been updated in the plugin repository in two whole years and appeared to be abandoned. You're probably the last person still using it, but I'll check it out later. I hadn’t looked at 1 Blog Cacher since it hadn’t been updated in the plugin repository in two whole years and appeared to be abandoned. You’re probably the last person still using it, but I’ll check it out later.

]]> By: Sue http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/#comment-1643 Sue Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:01:37 +0000 http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/?p=313#comment-1643 Curious to see if the 1 Blog Cacher has the problem. It's the one I use and am quite satisfied with it. http://1-blog-cacher.javier-garcia.com/ Curious to see if the 1 Blog Cacher has the problem. It’s the one I use and am quite satisfied with it.
http://1-blog-cacher.javier-garcia.com/

]]> By: Dave http://bad-behavior.ioerror.us/2009/12/03/beware-of-negative-caching/#comment-1642 Dave Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:53:27 +0000 http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/?p=313#comment-1642 I was one of those who wrote in. I moved to Super Cache and it seems to be much better. Hyper Cache apparently was also not serving updated pages to Firefox users. Ack. Cacheing is difficult to implement, it seems... Well, I was stunned by the speed of response and the accuracy of the diagnosis, and am pretty impressed overall.. I was one of those who wrote in. I moved to Super Cache and it seems to be much better. Hyper Cache apparently was also not serving updated pages to Firefox users. Ack. Cacheing is difficult to implement, it seems…

Well, I was stunned by the speed of response and the accuracy of the diagnosis, and am pretty impressed overall..

]]>